Structural problems are generally much more computationally costly compared to heat flow problems. Why is that?
- 35 Views
- Last Post 11 January 2019
Solid elements for structural models have 3 degrees of freedom on each node (x,y,z displacement), while thermal models have only 1 degree of freedom on each node (temperature). There is a factor of 3 right there.
Small features in the geometry create stress concentrations that must be resolved with many small elements because we are interested in the maximum stress. Small features in the geometry can be meshed more coarsely in a thermal model because it doesn't create a maximum temperature that is of interest. There could be 3 times as many nodes in a structural model compared with a thermal model to get results that converge on the true solution.
Multiply 3 by 3 and the structural model is now 9 times more costly to compute the solution than the thermal model.
I expect other members may give other examples.
- All Categories
- Community Rules, Guidelines, and Tips
- News & Announcements
- Student Products
- Pre and Post Processing
- Physics Simulation
- Tutorials, Articles and Textbooks
- Installation and Licensing
- Student Competition Teams
- eMasters Degree from UPM
- Site Feedback