Floating Point Error when running calculation

  • 35 Views
  • Last Post 4 weeks ago
adamfaeiz posted this 10 July 2019

I am trying to simulate the separation of Oil, Water and Gas in a 3 phase horizontal separator. I would like to run the problem for a duration of 1 hour. The result that I am looking for should look something like this video: 

 

I am using a VOF model with 3 Eulerian Phases (Water, Oil and Gas). 

 

When my calculations are running, I get a floating point error midway and the solver stops working. 

Any idea how to achieve 3600 s flow time for my CFD simulation?

 

 

 

 

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
rwoolhou posted this 10 July 2019

Staff are not allowed to download files or open attachments. 

Assuming the boundary set up is sensible and the mesh good quality check the time step: if you reduce it does the model work?

adamfaeiz posted this 11 July 2019

The following are my calculation parameters:

Time stepping method = Fixed

Time step size (s) = 0.1

Number of time steps = 36 000

Max Iterations / Time step = 1

Reporting interval = 100

Profile Update Interval = 100

The model works with small time steps but it requires a very long time to reach a solution.I tried reducing the time step to 0.001 s which means the number of time steps has to be 3600000. I only got flow time of 11.55 s after 12 hours of running calculations. I am trying to achieve a flow time of 3600 s to study the separation process.

 

Result obtained when flow time = 11.55 s. 

rwoolhou posted this 11 July 2019

You shouldn't use VOF & dispersed: use Multi-fluid VOF for this type of model (under the Eulerian option) which is covered in DOC. You may also be able to reduce the length of the inlet pipe. 

Multiphase models do need a small time step, you may get speed up with NITA and also using more cpu cores.  I'd also review the initialisation options (specifically patching) to get a good starting point. 

How many phases, and what volume fractions are you considering?

 

adamfaeiz posted this 12 July 2019

So these are my new model settings:

I got the following error in my console while running calculation:

 

 

Flow time = 1.549999952316284s, time step = 65

85 more time steps

 

Error at Node 0: Global Courant number is greater than 250.00 The

velocity field is probably diverging. Please check the solution

and reduce the time-step if necessary.

 

===============Message from the Cortex Process================================

 

Compute processes interrupted. Processing can be resumed.

 

==============================================================================

Field function saved in this object doesn't exist anymore.

 

Error: CAR: invalid argument [1]: wrong type [not a pair]

Error Object: ()

 

Error: Error Occured during handling message in WorkBench: Generic Command

 

Error Object: #f

 

 

Calculation complete.

 

 

 

 

I am considering 3 phases with the following volume fractions:

Oil = 0.3

Water = 0.3

Gas = 0.4

rwoolhou posted this 12 July 2019

OK, so Euler is a good choice.  The first part of the error is Courant Number: your time step is probably too big. The rest is the solver failing following the numerics failing. 

adamfaeiz posted this 15 July 2019

I'm already using a time step size of 0.0001s. If it is smaller it will take a very long time to run. Is it okay if i choose to run using implicit formulation so that there won't be a problem of Courant Number?

 

Also, what do you mean by "solver failing following the numerics failing" ? 

rwoolhou posted this 15 July 2019

Your time step is a function of the flow speed and cell size: as a result time steps can get very small. 

My comment refers to the errors. Typically something goes wrong (caused by settings etc) and that gives an initial error. From there we see a longer list of problems as the original issue triggers further failures in the code. Hence why we always want the full error and not just the last few lines of text. 

adamfaeiz posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi there, sorry I've been quiet for a while. 

So I updated my geometry as shown in the image below. The inlet pipe has been shortened as recommended. 

I was wondering if it is a good idea to use Discrete Phase Modelling (DPM) alongside Eulerian models. I came across this idea after reading some articles about multiphase CFD modelling.

Since I only have one inlet as the boundary condition, should I manipulate the volume fractions of gas, liquid and oil; or use the injection option in DPM. 

What is your input on this?

abenhadj posted this 4 weeks ago

DPM is only tracked with the primary phase and particles do not see free surface so you need some UDF's. If using inert particles and not two-way you can enable beta feature to track wither other phases.

Best regards,

Amine

abenhadj posted this 4 weeks ago

Moving to fluid thread

Best regards,

Amine

Close