I am simulating a system that has flow ranging from laminar to turbulent conditions (up to a Re≈10,000). For my analysis, I have to use a k-e model for various reasons. From some preliminary testing, it seems like some of the k-e turbulence models predict turbulence setting in too early as I ramp up the Reynolds number. Is there a specific wall function or k-e model I should use to better predict this laminar-turbulent transition region?
k-e model for the transition region
- 22 Views
- Last Post 09 April 2019
- Topic Is Solved
Do use the omega based transition models. If your device Re is already large just use full turbulent model (SST or GEKO). Stick into first node at yplus=1 And at least 15 cells across BL.
Some of my UDFs use k and epsilon, which is a major reason I was sticking to the k-e models. It seems like I can still access epsilon while using the omega-based models. That also seems to be true with the SST model. Is that correct? Do I need to change anything in my UDFs to switch from k-e models to k-w/SST models?
Check if the variable is available to avoid any crash. If not available you need to calculate it and adjust.
- All Categories
- Community Rules, Guidelines, and Tips
- News & Announcements
- Student Products
- Pre and Post Processing
- Physics Simulation
- Tutorials, Articles and Textbooks
- Installation and Licensing
- Student Competition Teams
- eMasters Degree from UPM
- Site Feedback